Lucky Bags is undoubtedly one of the most popular cornhole bag companies globally. The Sure Fire and Pro Snipers are staples at every event, and nearly everyone has thrown them. Lucky has experimented with various other bags over time, including the Celtics and Clovers, which I’ve reviewed. Though I haven’t tried the Shamrocks, O’Doyle’s, or regular Snipers yet, the Luciano marks Lucky’s entry into the highly competitive herringbone bag market. In my Lucky Luciano Cornhole Bags Review, I’ll explore how this new addition stands up to its competition.
Lucky Luciano Cornhole Bags Review
Speeds:
- Listed: 5/8
- Actual: 5.5/8.5
Bag Template Size: Large (L: 5.875″ x W: 5.875″)
Fullness: Medium-Full
Weight: 457g
Bead Fill Type: Disc
Carpet Bag: Yes
Herringbone Carpet: The Slow Side
The herringbone carpet has become the most popular slow side in cornhole. It’s important to note that “herringbone” refers to the pattern, not the fabric, so not all herringbone carpets play at the same speed. Generally, they hold between a 5 and a 6, with some reaching around a 7. The most common herringbone carpet is featured on the BG Wizard and BG Sorcerer, which plays around a 5-5.5 and doesn’t slow down in humidity—if anything, it speeds up to around a 6. This is a great speed range for me and most other players, and the Luciano utilizes this same carpet.
The Fast Side: Sure Fire Speed
The fast side of the Luciano uses the Sure Fire fast material, playing between an 8 and a 9, depending on who you ask. It’s soft but quick, playing around a 6 in humid conditions. For those familiar with bag materials, you might have already guessed that the Luciano is a 100% Wizard variant. It uses the exact same materials, so what’s the difference?
Weight and Fill: What Sets Luciano Apart
The difference lies in the fill and weight. Personally, I like heavier bags, and every Lucky bag I’ve thrown weighs in at 457g or higher, on the higher end of my scale. Wizards, on the other hand, are closer to 450g, making them lighter in hand. This weight difference may affect playability, as a heavier bag might move a little faster up the board.
As for the fill, BG uses a more active mixed fill, while Lucky sticks with a disc fill in the Luciano. This means that the Wizard is much easier to roll and flop with, being more active and hole-friendly. However, the Luciano’s disc fill makes it less forgiving in this regard, limiting its ability to roll or jump on the board.
Performance and Personal Preference
I was intrigued by the Luciano due to my fondness for Lucky bags and their awesome aesthetics. However, the Luciano didn’t perform as well for me as the Ninja Streets (2023 version), which also uses the same materials with a disc fill. The Luciano is not as thin or floppy as the older Streets, making it less suitable for my preferred block/push style game. It doesn’t excel in any particular area, but it’s a solid, do-it-all bag.
Final Thoughts: A Middle-of-the-Road Performer
Overall, the Luciano is a good bag, but it didn’t impress me in any specific way. It’s capable of handling various playing styles, but it doesn’t particularly excel in any. If you like the materials and want a versatile bag that can block, run the board, and occasionally roll, the Luciano is worth considering. For me, it’s a middle-of-the-road performer, likely to be in the top half of my next rankings update, but it didn’t wow me in any particular regard.
